Gholdengo vs Iron Valiant VGC: Stats, Speed Tiers & Best Builds | PokeStats
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Battle Metrics & Entity Analysis
Speed Tier Disadvantage
Gholdengo (84) is slower than Iron Valiant (116). Utilizing Trick Room or defensive Terastallization is highly recommended to counter the initial burst.
Performance Statistics
Pokémon Attributes & Stats
Win Probability
Detailed Data Matrix
| Attribute | Gholdengo | Iron Valiant |
|---|---|---|
| HP | 87 ▲ +13 | 74 |
| Attack | 60 | 130 ▲ +70 |
| Defense | 95 ▲ +5 | 90 |
| Sp. Atk | 133 ▲ +13 | 120 |
| Sp. Def | 91 ▲ +31 | 60 |
| Speed | 84 | 116 ▲ +32 |
| Type Matchup Bonus | 2.0x ▲ +1.5 | 0.5x |
| Effective Battle Power | 816 ▲ +259 | 558 |
| Total Stats | 550 | 590 ▲ +40 |
Head-to-Head Analysis
Popular Variations (60)
Gholdengo vs Iron Valiant: Strategic Breakdown & Best Choice? (Full Comparison)
🛡️ Counter-Bulk Strategy: Compared to the opponent, Gholdengo exhibits a much higher "Survival Threshold." Even in neutral matchups, it’s built to tank a hit from Iron Valiant and retaliate with a devastating counter-move.🔮 Elemental Advantage: From a typing standpoint, Gholdengo carries a strategic edge over its opponent. This allows for better synergy with core defensive pivots like Ting-Lu or Flutter Mane in Regulation I formats.
🌱 Growth Analysis: Gholdengo follows a Slow growth pattern. Compared to a Slow opponent, the resource investment required for competitive readiness varies significantly during early-game leveling.
🎯 Sweeper Role: With both elemental advantage and OHKO potential, Gholdengo functions as the primary "Win-con" in this matchup. Pairing it with a Fake Out user to guarantee a safe turn, or equipping a Choice Band to maximize Turn 1 pressure, is a pro-level tactical choice.
💥 Kill-Range Setup: Our metrics indicate that Gholdengo is in a prime position for an OHKO strike. If Iron Valiant isn't holding a Focus Sash, switching to a dedicated Defensive Wall is highly recommended to preserve tempo; otherwise, it faces immediate elimination.
In summary, this Gholdengo vs Iron Valiant full comparison highlights the tactical niches both Pokemon fill. When deciding on the best choice for your competitive roster, always account for item synergy.
📊 Damage Calculations (Lv.50 VGC, 31 IVs)
| Attack Scenario | Damage Range | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Gholdengo Flash Cannon** (0 EVs) vs Iron Valiant | 117–138% | ✅ Guaranteed OHKO |
| Gholdengo **Flash Cannon** (252 SpAtk EVs (+nature)) vs Iron Valiant | 155–183% | ✅ Guaranteed OHKO |
| Iron Valiant **Play Rough** (0 EVs) vs Gholdengo | 20–24% | ❌ No 2HKO |
| Iron Valiant **Play Rough (252 Atk EVs (+nature)) vs Gholdengo | 27–32% | ❌ No 2HKO |
⚡ Speed Tier Comparison (Lv.50 VGC)
*Technical Note: Analysis based on Pokémon Gen 9 (Regulation I) Database by PokeStats Lab. Damage calculations assume Lv.50, 31 IVs, neutral nature.*
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Does Gholdengo consistently outspeed Iron Valiant?
A: Based on Gen 9 base stats, Gholdengo has a 0 Speed vs Iron Valiant's 0. However, a Choice Scarf or Tailwind support can easily flip this matchup.
Q: Who is the better choice for a defensive wall?
A: It depends on your team needs. Gholdengo's Unknown type and bulk define its role as a pivot or utility lead compared to Iron Valiant.
Q: How do held items affect the Gholdengo vs Iron Valiant matchup?
A: Items like Focus Sash or Type-Resist Berries are game-changers. Gholdengo benefits from offensive items, while Iron Valiant might rely on Rocky Helmet.
Battle Prediction: Who do you think wins?
Cast your pick and see a simulated prediction based on your choice.
Explore More Tools
View All Tools →Bulbasaur vs Ivysaur Stats: Who Wins? | Pokemon Comparison
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Venusaur Stats: Who Wins? | Pokemon Comparison
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Charmander Stats: Who Wins? | Pokemon Comparison
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head