Verified Meta Data
Gholdengo vs Walking Wake VGC: Stats, Speed Tiers & Best Builds | PokeStats
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Battle Metrics & Entity Analysis
Speed Tier Disadvantage
Gholdengo (84) is slower than Walking Wake (109). Utilizing Trick Room or defensive Terastallization is highly recommended to counter the initial burst.
Player 1
Gholdengo
Paldea • Steel
Height1.2 m
Weight30 kg
VS
Player 2
Walking Wake
Paldea • Water
Height3.5 m
Weight280 kg
Performance Statistics
Pokémon Attributes & Stats
Gholdengo
4★
Character Rarity
Steel
Type
Paldea
Region
Walking Wake
4★
Character Rarity
Water
Type
Paldea
Region
Battle Simulator v1.0
Win Probability
Gholdengo Win Rate
Walking Wake Win Rate
Calculated based on base stats, type effectiveness, and 1,000 simulated battle rounds.
Detailed Data Matrix
| Attribute | Gholdengo | Walking Wake |
|---|---|---|
| HP | 87 | 99 ▲ +12 |
| Attack | 60 | 83 ▲ +23 |
| Defense | 95 ▲ +4 | 91 |
| Sp. Atk | 133 ▲ +8 | 125 |
| Sp. Def | 91 ▲ +8 | 83 |
| Speed | 84 | 109 ▲ +25 |
| Type Matchup Bonus | 1.0x | 1.0x |
| Effective Battle Power | 617 | 653 ▲ +36 |
| Total Stats | 550 | 590 ▲ +40 |
Head-to-Head Analysis
With nearly identical Base Stat Totals (550 and 590), this is a truly balanced and fiercely competitive matchup. Conversely, Walking Wake's impressive speed of 109 guarantees it strikes first almost every time, posing a significant tactical threat to Gholdengo. However, Walking Wake's rock-solid defense (91) will make it incredibly difficult for Gholdengo's physical strikes to leave a mark.
Popular Variations (60)
Gholdengo vs Walking Wake: Strategic Breakdown & Best Choice? (Full Comparison)
🌱 Growth Analysis: Gholdengo follows a Slow growth pattern. Compared to a Slow opponent, the resource investment required for competitive readiness varies significantly during early-game leveling.💥 Wallbreaker Potential: Gholdengo possesses elite base offensive stats. When facing Walking Wake's defensive core, it acts as a premier "Wallbreaker," capable of punching through defensive synergy with raw power alone.
In summary, this Gholdengo vs Walking Wake full comparison highlights the tactical niches both Pokemon fill. When deciding on the best choice for your competitive roster, always account for item synergy.
📊 Damage Calculations (Lv.50 VGC, 31 IVs)
| Attack Scenario | Damage Range | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Gholdengo Flash Cannon** (0 EVs) vs Walking Wake | 20–23% | ❌ No 2HKO |
| Gholdengo **Flash Cannon** (252 SpAtk EVs (+nature)) vs Walking Wake | 26–30% | ❌ No 2HKO |
| Walking Wake **Surf** (0 EVs) vs Gholdengo | 41–49% | ❌ No 2HKO |
| Walking Wake **Surf (252 SpAtk EVs (+nature)) vs Gholdengo | 56–65% | ⚠️ 2HKO |
⚡ Speed Tier Comparison (Lv.50 VGC)
*Technical Note: Analysis based on Pokémon Gen 9 (Regulation I) Database by PokeStats Lab. Damage calculations assume Lv.50, 31 IVs, neutral nature.*
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Does Gholdengo consistently outspeed Walking Wake?
A: Based on Gen 9 base stats, Gholdengo has a 0 Speed vs Walking Wake's 0. However, a Choice Scarf or Tailwind support can easily flip this matchup.
Q: Who is the better choice for a defensive wall?
A: It depends on your team needs. Gholdengo's Unknown type and bulk define its role as a pivot or utility lead compared to Walking Wake.
Q: How do held items affect the Gholdengo vs Walking Wake matchup?
A: Items like Focus Sash or Type-Resist Berries are game-changers. Gholdengo benefits from offensive items, while Walking Wake might rely on Rocky Helmet.
Battle Prediction: Who do you think wins?
Cast your pick and see a simulated prediction based on your choice.
VS
Explore More Tools
View All Tools →Bulbasaur vs Ivysaur Stats: Who Wins? | Pokemon Comparison
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Venusaur Stats: Who Wins? | Pokemon Comparison
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head
Bulbasaur vs Charmander Stats: Who Wins? | Pokemon Comparison
Compare two Pokemon base stats, types, and competitive metrics head-to-head